Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Что думаешь? Оцени!
showing you the search engine results page (SERP) ranking for each keyword you。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
这还要回到去年月之暗面在战略上的“急刹车”，其以海外市场为主，通过API调用带动收入，都是从去年开始逐步成型的。，更多细节参见WPS官方版本下载
See all 20 tools →
One striking characteristic of Gelidium is that it must be wild-harvested rather than farmed. Unlike Gracilaria for culinary agar production, Gelidium grows slowly and thrives only in cold, turbulent waters over rocky seabeds, conditions nearly impossible to replicate in aquaculture. This dependence on wild harvesting explains the need for seaweed collectors during WWII, and continues to make Gelidium a strategically critical resource.。关于这个话题，91视频提供了深入分析